No, that isn't Jim Mora. That is three different emotions for the Washington Nationals clinching their first ever playoff birth.
For many fans, it is Playoffs! Having such a bad team since the existence of the franchise has been tough. Watching 16 bad Redskins games or 82 bad Wizards games is nothing compared to watching 162 bad Nationals games. And since 2005 (3/4 of the first season excluded) the team has been fairly bad. The idea that the franchise has clinched a playoff spot is somewhat surreal.
For the team it is (or it should be) Playoffs. Good job. Shake hands. Season ain't over yet. For fans of a team it is different than for players on a team. For guys like Ryan Zimmerman it may feel different than a guy like Edwin Jackson who was winning a World Series last year. But overall the team shouldn't really be satisfied.
For other fans in the DC area it is Playoffs? Teams in the city have been to the playoffs before. Teams in the city have had the best record before. However, teams in the city don't ever win the playoff games or series that they "should" and they sure don't win championships, at least not for 20 years.
So pick a stance. Either way you look at it the team is in the playoffs. Be happy. Be indifferent. Or be a pretty princess who wants more (like me). And hopefully, see you at the ballpark in October.
So how do you feel?
Showing posts with label Playoffs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Playoffs. Show all posts
A Little Perspective
DC Sports Nexus ---- Wednesday, May 30, 2012
The Nationals are sitting atop of the NL East with a 4 game lead over the Philadelphia Phillies.
If your a casual baseball fan and you read that line you might say, "Hey now that's not half bad". Then you'd take a look at the standings, see the Phillies are the LAST place team in the division, and scratch your head:
Fear not because your eyes do not deceive you. The entire NL East is above .500. So what does this mean for the Washington Nationals? Well a couple of things...
A Weak Division?
People like to use certain, predictable insults against teams that are in first place. One of the most popular is that the first place team is in a weak division. This season I have heard tons of people saying that the Nats are lucky that the Phillies are having a terrible season and that the Braves are plagued with injuries. Sure the Phillies aren't in first place, but in my book being 4 games out of the division lead is far from "terrible". Sorry I don't subscribe to the notion that Philadelphia should always be in first, but that kind of thing SHOULDN'T be expected in a truly competitive division, which the NL East has become.
I'm not even going to touch on the injury argument...
The way I see it, the "weak division" argument holds a lot more water with a team like Texas, who is the ONLY team above .500 in the AL West. Or how about the Dodgers, who play in the only division with TWO teams under 20 wins for the season.
Don't Get Cocky!
This probably goes without saying, but I've heard enough people talking about the playoffs already that I think this needs to be said. Being in a competitive division proves that the Nationals are a legitimate team, but it also means that holding onto first place is going to be all that more difficult. Lets not forget that during the 2005 season the Nationals held first place between June 5th and July 24th, getting to 19 games over .500 with a 5.5 game lead over the rest of the NL East. We ended the season like this:
So Whats the Point?
Now I'm not predicting a mid-season collapse from this team. In fact, far from it. We have a pair of dominate pitchers leading our rotation, a great mixture of youth and experience at the plate and in the field, and also should have the expectation that the team will only get better as players start to come off the DL. There is every reason to believe that this team is capable of special things. So show some confidence when people try and tell us the Nats are a fluke.
Confidence like Harper showed when he said:
But don't get to far ahead of ourselves, like Harper did when he said:
In Bryce's defense he did just finishing watching Gio pitch an absolute gem against the Braves.
Question: When I heard Bryce talking about the Cy Young it rubbed me the wrong way. I know he said "hopefully", but for some reason it still came off as a little presumptuous. Am I crazy or did it bother you a little too?
If your a casual baseball fan and you read that line you might say, "Hey now that's not half bad". Then you'd take a look at the standings, see the Phillies are the LAST place team in the division, and scratch your head:
Fear not because your eyes do not deceive you. The entire NL East is above .500. So what does this mean for the Washington Nationals? Well a couple of things...
A Weak Division?
People like to use certain, predictable insults against teams that are in first place. One of the most popular is that the first place team is in a weak division. This season I have heard tons of people saying that the Nats are lucky that the Phillies are having a terrible season and that the Braves are plagued with injuries. Sure the Phillies aren't in first place, but in my book being 4 games out of the division lead is far from "terrible". Sorry I don't subscribe to the notion that Philadelphia should always be in first, but that kind of thing SHOULDN'T be expected in a truly competitive division, which the NL East has become.
I'm not even going to touch on the injury argument...
The way I see it, the "weak division" argument holds a lot more water with a team like Texas, who is the ONLY team above .500 in the AL West. Or how about the Dodgers, who play in the only division with TWO teams under 20 wins for the season.
Don't Get Cocky!
This probably goes without saying, but I've heard enough people talking about the playoffs already that I think this needs to be said. Being in a competitive division proves that the Nationals are a legitimate team, but it also means that holding onto first place is going to be all that more difficult. Lets not forget that during the 2005 season the Nationals held first place between June 5th and July 24th, getting to 19 games over .500 with a 5.5 game lead over the rest of the NL East. We ended the season like this:
So Whats the Point?
Now I'm not predicting a mid-season collapse from this team. In fact, far from it. We have a pair of dominate pitchers leading our rotation, a great mixture of youth and experience at the plate and in the field, and also should have the expectation that the team will only get better as players start to come off the DL. There is every reason to believe that this team is capable of special things. So show some confidence when people try and tell us the Nats are a fluke.
Confidence like Harper showed when he said:
"I think Gio's a No. 1 pitcher. Every time we go out there I think we're going to win with him on the bump."
But don't get to far ahead of ourselves, like Harper did when he said:
"Hopefully he [Gio] can win a Cy Young this year. That’d be great."
In Bryce's defense he did just finishing watching Gio pitch an absolute gem against the Braves.
Question: When I heard Bryce talking about the Cy Young it rubbed me the wrong way. I know he said "hopefully", but for some reason it still came off as a little presumptuous. Am I crazy or did it bother you a little too?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)